Free shipping over $99 | Interest Free *no credit check* financing is available!

Despite Historic Filibuster, Missouri Senate Advances Legislative Assault on LGBT People

by Stephen Peters March 09, 2016

Today, HRC, the ACLU of Missouri, and PROMO strongly condemned a vote by the Missouri Senate in favor of Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 39 – a measure that could enshrine discrimination against LGBT people and their families into the state constitution. Similar to so-called “First Amendment Defense Act” legislation introduced in other states, this outrageous and extreme resolution would lead to a ballot measure that proposes to allow individuals, organizations, and businesses to use religion as a valid excuse to discriminate against LGBT people by broadly redefining the definition of religious organizations. The measure must receive one final administrative approval vote before being sent to the House of Representatives.

The vote to pass the outrageous proposal attacking LGBT Missourians and their families came after a historic filibuster effort by Senate Democrats attempting to stop the anti-equality majority. The discriminatory proposal has received widespread condemnation from fair-minded Missourians and businesses throughout the state, includingGovernor Jay Nixon, the St. Louis Post Dispatch, the St. Louis Regional ChamberDow Chemical Company, and Monsanto. The St. Louis Regional Chamber said the proposal is “counter to MO values & will have negative economic consequences.” Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders also spoke out against the bill.

“Religious freedom is one of our nation’s fundamental values, and that’s why it’s firmly protected in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,” said HRC Legal Director Sarah Warbelow. “This reckless legislation has nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with enabling discrimination against LGBT Missourians and their families. Discrimination against LGBT people should never be sanctioned by the state, and we call on the Missouri House of Representatives to resoundingly reject this outrageous resolution.”

“Laws that promote discrimination are anti-democratic, harm Missouri families, and – as we’ve learned in Indiana – are bad for our economy,” said ACLU of Missouri Executive Director Jeffrey Mittman. “That is why so many Missourians, including clergy and business leaders, strongly oppose any effort – such as SJR 39 – that would seek to enshrine inequality in our Missouri Constitution.”

“We agree that religion is a fundamental right, which is why it is protected in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and in our existing Human Rights Act. We are not arguing that clergy and churches should be denied their freedom of religion,” said PROMO Executive Director Steph Perkins. “But those same religious beliefs cannot be used as a reason to deny someone the same services that are offered to the rest of the public by private businesses. And that is exactly what SJR 39 aims to do. Businesses and organizations have already been rightly concerned about the consequences of this bill and are outspoken in their opposition.”

SJR 39 goes far beyond protecting the right of free exercise of one’s religion. While shrouded in language framed as prohibiting the state government from making funding or tax status decisions based on an organization’s views on marriage that are driven by religious belief, in reality it opens the door to discrimination against same-sex couples, their families, and those who love them.

The legislation could have reckless intended and unintended consequences. If voted into law, LGBT people and their families could suddenly find themselves at risk of being denied many basic services. Taxpayer-funded foster care providers and adoption agencies could refuse to place children in need of loving homes with same-sex couples. Taxpayer-funded homeless shelters could turn away LGBT couples and their families. Businesses could refuse to provide goods or services to same-sex couples. The measure could also undermine existing LGBT non-discrimination protections passed at the local level, including in cities like Columbia, Kansas City, and St. Louis.

The resolution addresses no real problem in the state as no federal or state law requires religious organizations or clergy to sanction or perform same-sex marriages.

Stephen Peters
Stephen Peters


Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.

Also in Think

6 Things You Should Know About King Cobra Before Seeing It

by michael ciriaco October 23, 2016

The much-waiting King Cobra is out this weekend. So we though we’d come up with a quick guide to dramatic lead up to the release, from the Brent Corrigan‘s totally understandable objections to Franco’s even deeper dive into gay life. 1. Boos From Brent King Cobra chronicles the porn career of Brent Corrigan (nee Sean Paul Lockhart), [...]

Continue Reading →

Calendar Pinups Show Off Pecs N’ Pups, Kathy Griffin Trolls Trump, Cher Duets With James Corden

by Derek de Koff October 23, 2016

Pecs and pups! In this 2017 calendar, strapping musclemen doff their shirts in order to save a bunch of defenseless puppies. Woof, amirite? Hello…?  Order here: Cher and James Corden gave a not-so subtle facelift to a stone-cold classic, and “I Got You Bae” was born. In a parody of Hillary Clinton‘s “Mirrors” video, Kathy Griffin [...]

Continue Reading →

New York’s “City Gym Boys” Perform Muscly Dance Routine For “The View”

by Derek de Koff October 23, 2016

New York-based City Gym Boys is “an urban fitness company dedicated to shaping minds and bodies.” And judging by this clip of a recent appearance on The View, they really know how to cut a rug. Related: Watch These Guys Show Off Their New Orleans Dance Moves Last August, The View introduced a dance content set to Mary J. Blige’s [...]

Continue Reading →