30% OFF Pride collection code: USAPRIDE! Free Shipping over $99

South Carolina Senate Committee Advances Anti-Marriage Equality Bill

by Ryan Wilson March 28, 2016

Last week, a handful of conservative state Senators in South Carolina voted to advance S.31, a bill calling on the US Congress to amend the United States Constitution to allow states to roll back marriage equality on a state by state basis, but ultimately the bill has little chance of passing this session.

S.31 was introduced last year by conservative Senator Larry Grooms, but the bill has been stuck in limbo in the Senate Judiciary Committee since last April. Finally, after months of skipping over the bill - a clear sign that committee members have no appetite for it -  S.31 was amended and advanced with a vote of 17 to 3. HRC thanks the three Democrats on the committee, Senators Sabb, Bright-Matthews, and Hutto, for voting against this bill.

Seeking to undermine the historic marriage equality ruling last year by the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, S.31 calls on Congress to host a constitutional convention to amend the Constitution of the United States to allow all states to determine their own definitions of marriage. If the Constitution were to be amended in this way, it would give states the ability to roll back marriage equality if they oppose it,, effectively stripping away years of progress and placing millions of same-sex marriages in jeopardy.

Fortunately, that prospect is not likely:  the South Carolina legislature has no authority to force Congress to begin the process of amending the Constitution, and would not be able to influence the outcome of that process. This bill is simply political theatre for anti-equality legislators to publicly show their displeasure with the Supreme Court of the United States ruling last June.

Thankfully, after the committee voted to advance the bill, Senator Hutto placed an administrative hold on the bill known as a “minority report”. With a minority report, the bill cannot be brought up on the Senate floor unless it receives a two-thirds vote to place it on Special Order. If the bill were to receive Special Order, it would be placed behind a mounting pile of other contentious legislative priorities for this session.

HRC will continue to monitor this bill and nine other anti-equality pieces of legislation and support the local work of our partners at South Carolina Equality and the ACLU of South Carolina. These attacks on fairness and equality in South Carolina are part of an onslaught of anti-LGBT bills being pushed in 2016 by anti-equality activists around the country. HRC is currently tracking nearly 200 anti-LGBT bills in 34 states. For more information, visit: www.hrc.org/2016legislature.

Ryan Wilson
Ryan Wilson


Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.

Also in Think

How Trump’s love for Putin is allowing the Russian right to export anti-LGBTQ hatred

by John Gallagher February 23, 2017

We’ve already discussed why Trump’s relationship with Vladimir Putin is terrible for us. But in light of the expanding firestorm over Russia’s outsized influence in the Trump administration, the question is, just how terrible. As it turns out, it could be worse than we imagined. Trump’s campaign was bizarrely and distressingly cozy with anti-democratic Russia. The candidate himself openly [...]

Continue Reading →

And the winners of the 2017 Queerties are…

by David Reddish February 22, 2017

Congrats to all the winners and nominees!

Continue Reading →

Two super hot models rescue seven children from freezing cold pond in NYC

by Graham Gremore February 22, 2017

"I was in this park for a reason tonight," Jonas says. "I could’ve been anywhere right now but I was 100 yards away from kids who are drowning."

Continue Reading →