30% OFF Pride collection code: USAPRIDE! Free Shipping over $99

Breaking News: Missouri House Committee Votes Down Radical Anti-LGBT SJR 39

by Stephen Peters April 27, 2016

Today, HRC hailed the Missouri House Emerging Issues Committee for voting down Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 39 – a measure that sought to enshrine state-sanctioned discrimination against LGBT people and their families into the Missouri Constitution. The extreme resolution would have led to a ballot measure that proposes to allow individuals, organizations, and businesses to use religion as a legal excuse to discriminate against LGBT people by broadly redefining the definition of religious organizations.

“We thank the House committee for listening to the overwhelming chorus of fair-minded Missourians, business leaders, and civil rights advocates who demanded they oppose this radical legislation that threatens severe harm to the entire state,” said JoDee Winterhof, HRC Senior Vice President for Policy & Political Affairs. “However, even with this vote today, we must remain diligent to ensure this discriminatory legislation does not move in any other way during the final two weeks of the legislative session.”

The opposition to SJR 39 was overwhelming. More than 60 leading CEOs and business executives signed onto an open letter urging lawmakers to stop the proposal that would have extreme negative consequences for Missouri’s economy, and numerous companies including Dow Chemical Company and Monsanto spoke out. In addition, SJR 39 has received widespread condemnation from fair-minded Missourians and civic leaders throughout the state, including Governor Jay Nixon, the St. Louis Post Dispatch, the St. Louis Regional Chamber.  The St. Louis Regional Chamber said the proposal is “counter to MO values & will have negative economic consequences.” Both Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders also spoke out against the resolution.

SJR 39 went far beyond protecting the right of free exercise of one’s religion, opening the door to discrimination against same-sex couples, their families, and those who love them.

For example, if SJR 39 had been voted into law, LGBT people and their families could have suddenly found themselves at risk of being denied many basic services. Taxpayer-funded foster care providers and adoption agencies could have refused to place children in need of loving homes with same-sex couples. Taxpayer-funded homeless shelters could have turned away LGBT couples and their families. Businesses could have also used it as cover to refuse to provide goods or services to same-sex couples. And, the measure could have undermined existing LGBT non-discrimination protections passed at the local level, including in cities like Columbia, Kansas City, and St. Louis.

While SJR 39 has been defeated, Missouri still lacks explicit, statewide non-discrimination protections for LGBT people.

Stephen Peters
Stephen Peters


Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.

Also in Think

And the winners of the 2017 Queerties are…

by David Reddish February 22, 2017

Congrats to all the winners and nominees!

Continue Reading →

Two super hot models rescue seven children from freezing cold pond in NYC

by Graham Gremore February 22, 2017

"I was in this park for a reason tonight," Jonas says. "I could’ve been anywhere right now but I was 100 yards away from kids who are drowning."

Continue Reading →

Italy’s anti-discrimination head embroiled in gay sex club scandal

by John Russell February 22, 2017

Francesco Spano is accused of funneling tens of thousands of euros to three gay sex venues.

Continue Reading →