Free shipping over $99 | Interest Free *no credit check* financing is available!

House Rules Committee Rejects Vote on Amendment Safeguarding LGBT Protections in Federal Contracting

by HRC staff May 18, 2016

Today, HRC blasted the House Republican Leadership for preventing a debate and vote on an amendment to remove an anti-LGBT provision from the Fiscal Year 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA) offered the bipartisan amendment to strike the provision, which would allow, under the guise of religious liberty, taxpayer-funded discrimination in contracts and grants across the federal government.

The provision jeopardizes President Obama’s executive order prohibiting discrimination in federal contracting based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

HRC Government Affairs Director David Stacy released the following statement:

“We are extremely disappointed that the House Republican Leadership has refused to allow a debate and vote on a bipartisan amendment to strike a discriminatory, harmful provision that undercuts protections for LGBT employees of federal contractors and grantees. The House is poised to join the ranks of North Carolina, Mississippi, Indiana and other states that are targeting LGBT Americans.”

“We are grateful to Reps. Charlie Dent (R-PA) and Adam Smith (D-WA) for leading the amendment, and to their strong bipartisan cosponsors--Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), Richard Hanna (R-NY), Mike Coffman (R-CO), Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Rick Larsen (D-WA), Kurt Schrader (D-OR) and Scott Peters (D-CA). They understand that this House should be expanding protections for LGBT people rather than catering to the far right wing and taking our country backwards.”

The anti-LGBT provision, which originated as an amendment offered by Rep. Steve Russell (R-OK), was approved by a vote of 33-29 last month in the House Armed Services Committee. It would allow sweeping anti-LGBT discrimination in all federal agencies, not just the Department of Defense. The vaguely-written amendment could have far-reaching consequences, potentially even undermining existing federal nondiscrimination provisions protecting workers against discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, and more.

HRC staff
HRC staff


Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.

Also in Think

The Reality Of Being A Gay Frat Boy

by Dan Tracer October 23, 2016

Frats offer no shortage of mythology, from extreme hazing to wild parties to closeted hookups. But the reality is much different, of course. Well, usually. Below, get a window into the gay frat experience through Whisper. We’d definitely like the expanded version of a few of these stories:

Continue Reading →

Cultural Appropriation Does Not Make David Bowie An LGBT Icon

by Dan Tracer October 23, 2016

October is LGBT History Month and Equality Forum is honoring an icon a day all month long, including David Bowie, who was honored October 7, despite the fact that he would probably look askance at such a title. David Bowie played with identity throughout his career, trying on different persona and presentations as regularly as he changed [...]

Continue Reading →

6 Things You Should Know About King Cobra Before Seeing It

by michael ciriaco October 23, 2016

The much-waiting King Cobra is out this weekend. So we though we’d come up with a quick guide to dramatic lead up to the release, from the Brent Corrigan‘s totally understandable objections to Franco’s even deeper dive into gay life. 1. Boos From Brent King Cobra chronicles the porn career of Brent Corrigan (nee Sean Paul Lockhart), [...]

Continue Reading →